Official Site - The Legatum Prosperity Index is an inquiry into the nature of prosperity and how it is created. We have built on last year's inaugural publication with expanded coverage and refined analysis, investgating prosperity drivers and outcomes in more than 100 countries.
Material wealth, Life satisfaction, economic growth global prosperity happiness quality of life
 
   
 
   
   
   
Country Flag  

India

  GLOBAL RANK: 70th of 104     

India ties for 70th place with Ukraine. Its Economic Competitiveness rank is 57th, and its Comparative Liveability rank is lower at 80th place. This low score for Comparative Liveability is in part a result of very low incomes for the many Indians living in poverty.



This modernising democracy of 1.1 billion people has reached rates of economic expansion of 9% in recent years, with growing software outsourcing and hi-tech manufacturing sectors. However, India’s inefficient agricultural sector is still sustained by government subsidies, energy and transport infrastructure is severely underdeveloped, and natural resources face significant strain. Moreover, the recent dynamic growth seems to have lifted the nascent middle class with fewer benefits for the 80% of Indians who still live on less than $1 a day. India also faces challenges from widespread corruption, and from occasional violence between its many ethnic and religious groups.
 
FAST FACTS
Population1.1 billion
(2008 est)
Average Life
Satisfaction
5.2
(2007 est.)
GDP
(PPP)
$2.989 trillion
(2007 est.)
GDP
(Growth)
9.2%
(2007 est.)
GDP
(per Capita)
$2,700
(2007 est.)
FDI
(net inflow)
0.83%
(2006 est.)
Exports13.83%
(2006 est.)
Imports20.06%
(2006 est.)
Unemployment7.2%
(2007 est.)
Life Expectancy69.25 years
(2008 est.)
Political System Federal Republic
Foreign Aid 0.10%
(2006 est.)


One of the main factors constraining India’s material wealth is poor mass education levels, with only 1.51 years of secondary education per worker on average. Productivity is likely lower than it might otherwise be as a result of a lack of educated workers, although considerable progress has been made in terms of professional training in recent years.

Despite continuing low levels of capital investment in most regions and the high costs of starting a business, India began to shift to a higher growth path in the 1980s, following three decades of disappointing economic performance. Reforms then accelerated further in the 1990s. This growth has allowed India to escape dependence on foreign aid.

The expanding middle class now provides a motor of growth through demand for services, manufactured goods and new housing stock. In all areas of wealth creation, India outstrips its South Asian neighbours. Successive waves of economic reform have freed up domestic enterprise, encouraged foreign investment and facilitated greater international trade. This has resulted in a rapid increase in the number of patents granted, most notably in the pharmaceutical sector.


India ranks much lower in Comparative Liveability than in Economic Competitiveness. Low incomes are still the greatest barrier to Comparative Liveability for hundreds of millions of Indians, particularly those living in urban slums or poorer rural areas. Although the material resources available to villagers or town dwellers are rising, they are still within a range that leaves adequate healthcare, nutrition and shelter out of reach for many.

Community life scores are also poor, particularly in terms of charitable giving, with only 6%g of respondents to the Gallup World Poll having given to charity in the preceding month. Furthermore, only 62%g of Indians report that they have someone to rely on, a very low score by global standards.

Ameliorating factors for life satisfaction are the low levels of divorce, at a mere 0.2%g of the population, and the warm climate, which is a boon for those too poor to afford adequate heating and housing.










All subindicator scores in the Index are shown unweighted, expressed as a percentage of the score for the best-performing country in the Index. Indicator scores (in dark blue) are derived from the weighted average of relevant subindicators. For more information on how the subindicator scores are weighted to produce indicator scores and an overall Index score and ranking, see Chapter Two of this report.







References:
g, w Click here for further details including date of survey, sample size, and margin of error.
   
 
©2008 Legatum Limited. All rights reserved. | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy |